The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001
The line graph illustrates the generated amount of three distinct energy types, including petroleum, coal and natural gas from 1981 to 2001 in Europe. Overall, it is apparent that petroleum and natural gas had the opposite trend as coal in this period.
Looking at the details, natural gas had the lowest starting point, under 10 trillion units in 1981, which was one-third the amount of two other types at the same time. Then it experienced a rapid growth to reach the peak at over 30 trillion units in 2001, which tripled the first figure recorded. Saw a similar trend as natural gas, although had remained stable between 1986 and 1991, petroleum still stood at the highest place among three types of energy, from around 35 trillion units in 1981 to 50 trillion units in 2001.
In contrast, coal was the only type of energy in Europe which witnessed a decline tendency. It started with 30 trillion units in 1981, which could be considered to compete with petroleum to take the first place. Then coal’s figure dropped dramatically in the next 20 years, to hit the bottom in 2001 with nearly 20 trillion units, which lower than natural gas’s statistics at the same time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, still, then, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35205039001 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.449786513 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160943497424 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787551710572 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803819000942 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119343553421 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456848144021 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.