The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010.

Essay topics:

The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010.

The line graph compares the information about the annual income earned by different three bakeries
namely lovely loaves, Bernie's buns and Robbie bakery in London from 2000 to 2010. As an overview, in the first year the highest income observed in the lovely loaves which replaced by Robbie bakery in the last year.

It is clear from the chart that, in 2000 the yearly income of Lovely loaves was 80,000 thousand pounds. Whereas, the same total of other two bakeries noticed as roughly 75 thousand pounds. However, this bakery remained erratic and it dropped to 40 thousand pound in 2010.

Moving towards other two bakeries, a consistency can observed in the yearly income of Robbie bakery with almost 55 thousand pounds. Afterwards, there was continuing rise in the annual income. Making it, the most profitable in the last two years at around 105,000 thousand pounds in the last year. Furthermore, the annual income of Bernie's buns around 20,000 thousand pounds by 2003 that earning doubled. Whereas, the income remained constant for the rest of two years. At last, by 2010, as consistent growth can seen in the yearly income of this bakery around 63,000 thousand pound in the 2010.

To sum up, the increasing trend was following by the annual income of Bernie's buns and Robert bakery. While, it was opposite in the case of Lovely loaves in the given time period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncome earned by different three bakeries namely lovely loaves, Bernies buns and R...
^^^
Line 6, column 513, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...last, by 2010, as consistent growth can seen in the yearly income of this bakery aro...
^^^^
Line 8, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...come of Bernies buns and Robert bakery. While, it was opposite in the case of Lovely ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, whereas, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92672413793 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29021320968 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9731766277 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9230769231 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223897588952 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863368305519 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133915874141 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164938274319 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13429462082 0.0819641961636 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.