The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000.
The line graph reveals information regarding to the amount of marriages and divorces in the UK from 1975 to 2000, a period of 25 years.
In general, the biggest number was given for total marriages while the figure of 1st marriages has shown a mild drop. It is noticeable that a modest growth was being illustrated in the divorces.
Starting from roughly 500,000 marriages in 1975, total marriages in the UK have increased sharply to more than 600,000 marriages in 1985. Total marriages then fell slightly in 1995 and ended up with around 590,000 marriages in 2000. Meanwhile, 1st marriages have increased gradually to 410,000 in 1985 but dropped dramatically to 300,000 marriages in 2000.
Throughout the first 15 years, 2nd marriages continued a stable climb with slightly acceleration whereas divorces started to become popular. In 1990, the same figure of 220,000 cases were given for both 2nd marriages and divorces. After a small volatility of the next 10 years, both 2nd marriages and divorces have reached approximately 250,000 marriages together in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | Mike-Huang | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely 250,000 marriages together in 2000.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17919075145 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7432968189 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2352435582 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326086876291 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14344669053 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955533726608 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211742032506 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917040471823 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.