Here, the graph demonstrates the four globally museum which was visitors arrived over there over the period of 35 years, units are measured in millions.
Overall, at a fleeting glance, It is manifest that the most striking museum is Louvre which dominance the market, howbeit, London science museum were made least amount of visitors.
At a first glance, the chart reveals that initially, the number of visitors who visit to the Louvre museum were presented in the peak at around 8 millions in the year 1980, the similar figure can be observed in the 2000, yet after reached to 9 millions in 1995 and throughout the end of the stipulated period the figure has been reached to just below 10 millions. It is interesting to note that although Vatican museum visitors were only well below 5 millions in the beginning year, the ratio has been significantly inclined to nearly more than 9 millions at the end of the period.
Further analysis of the graph portrays that the proportion of London science museum visitors was roughly 4 millions and its stable until 1985 then it modestly declined to almost 2 millions in 2015. It can be clearly observed that the ratio of Shenzhen museum starting from less than 4 millions people and settling to 4 millions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'made the least'.
Suggestion: made the least
...et, howbeit, London science museum were made least amount of visitors. At a first glance,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figure can be observed in the 2000, yet after reached to 9 millions in 1995 and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81860465116 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52022645286 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8631809393 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.666666667 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8333333333 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128779288157 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682198737724 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029787911198 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816800604129 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232225609431 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.