The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
Presented is the graph exhibiting the amount of oil produced on a daily basis in six Gulf nations from 1990 to 2010.
As illustrated in the graph, the majority of nations witnessed an upward trend in oil production, with the exception of Qatar. Another interesting point is Saudi Arabia maintained the position as the major producer over the two-decade timescale.
Specifically, in the initial year, Saudi Arabia accounted for well over 8 million quarrels of oil, almost doubling other nations whose figures were averagely at 4 millions. The following years, this country strengthened its position in oil production by going through a surge to over 14 million quarrels, which were twofold its starting capacity, and maintained its dominant role in oil industry. Conversely, Qatar, despite experiencing a volatility in the period, this country produced the least amount of oil with a modest figure of under 2 millions.
Iran was the second-ranking oil producer in 1990 with approximately 3.5 millions per day, but after a slight increase, its capacity remained modest, which was merely one-third the figure of leading producer. The same upturn pattern was seen in the remaining countries, Iraq, Kuwait and UAE, which shared the capacity of nearly 4 million quarrels at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ssed an upward trend in oil production, with the exception of Qatar. Another interesting point is Sau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ern was seen in the remaining countries, Iraq, Kuwait and UAE, which shared the c...
^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion quarrels at the end of the period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, second, then, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87421200933 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4480890701 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212585014885 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881080848269 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662908801997 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129766948796 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703240615525 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.