The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table compares five brands in terms of their mobile phone sales over the 2006-2012 period.
As can be seen, the downward trend was shown in the total sale of Nokia, Ericsson and Motorola, while Samsung and Apple followed the opposite trend. Interestingly, although Nokia sold the most mobile phones initially, the best-seller brand was regarded for Samsung at the end of the period.
In 2006, Nokia was the most popular mobile phone brand with 345 million products sold in the market. After peaking at 475 million products in 2008, the sale of Nokia was slightly decreased to 335 millions in 2012, being the second best-seller phone brand. The number of phones sold of Motorola was over twice that of Ericsson in the first year, particularly 210 million products. Despite the peak of 102 millions of Ericsson, both brands experienced a dramatic drop and ended with 28 million phones in 2012.
In marked contrast, the phone sale of Samsung constantly surged to 396.5 million products, which tripled its own sale in 2007. This figure also made Samsung the best-seller brand eventually. In terms of Apple, although established in 2007, its sale rocketed from 2.3 to 24 millions in 2009. The figure continued rising rapidly over three times to 135.8 millions, making it the most prospective phone brand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '102 million'.
Suggestion: 102 million
...0 million products. Despite the peak of 102 millions of Ericsson, both brands experienced a dra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04147465438 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48775377716 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5559667791 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4545454545 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174220305846 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078507846947 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546369051427 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113414425763 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383002626223 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.