The table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005. It also shows a projection to the year 2015.
The table compares the average distance traveled per person by five different means of transport in a European nation between 1995 and 2005, and its projection after 10 years.
As illustrated in the statistics, the distance by bus contributed by far the largest of the total distance in the years surveyed. While almost vehicles are estimated to show an upward trend in the distance traveled, bus is forecast to show an opposite pattern.
In the year 1995, inhabitants in this European country showed a preference for bus, whose figure was 56 thousand miles, accounting for 50 percent of the total . Despite being the dominated mode, the following decade will see a slight decrease to 42 thousand miles per person. In contrast, although a second-preferred transport, rail is projected to be used more, with the distance traveled marginally rising by 12 thousands. Rail will also replace bus to be the most favored modes of travel.
Airplane and bicycle shared the same average distance of 2 thousands in 1995. However, the following year is estimated to witness a sharp upturn of airplane when its figure will rocket to 20 thousand miles, tenfold of its initial figure. Despite this increasing popularity, the distance of this mode will only take up a marginal amount of the total. Bicycle and motorbike’ distance traveled are estimated to contribute the sum of a negligible 10 thousands to the total distance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., accounting for 50 percent of the total . Despite being the dominated mode, the f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08154506438 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84938601412 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579399141631 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3695091709 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24713729627 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085682411504 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678028535553 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151532647223 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698489627614 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.