Some people think that hosting an international sports events is good for the country, while some people think this is bad. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The notion of organizing an international sports competition has raised conflict when it comes to the benefits that the host country could receive. It is claimed that the proposition would exert a positive influence on certain aspects of the nation, whilst the critics lay emphasis on the negativity. This action will be scrutinized on both merits and demerits in this essay, then the author’s perspective will be outlined.
On the one hand, the transnational sporting events undoubtedly provide opportunities for the host’s promotion in cultural aspects. Specifically, in light of these occasional competitions, the nation’s distinctive culture would be popularized globally via mascots and advertisements, which therefore might not only elevate its national identity but indirectly stimulate the tourism industry as well. For instance, the mascot of yellow buffalo has become a symbol of Vietnam since SEA Games 2003, and Vietnamese culture has also been more well-known by foreigners. Furthermore, the festivals could lay a solid foundation for a sustainable and mutually beneficial relationship among nations, enhancing the possibility of the cooperation in such fields as economy and politics.
On the other hand, there are arguments as to the downside of hosting international sports events, and the economic benefit is regarded as one of the prime problems. Particularly, to sponsor a spectacular international events,the government may have to allocate an enormous funding in multiple aspects such as facilities and accommodation for athletes, which might be a great financial burden on developing countries. After the SEA Games , for example, Vietnam had to compensate for a huge financial loss, raising the residents’ doubts as to the nation’s capability of sponsoring coming events.
To recapitulate, although hosting an international sports event could bring certain benefits regarding culture and tourism to the host nation, the demerits on economic field cannot be neglected. Nevertheless, I am convinced that the advantages of this notion far outweigh the disadvantages, and I would recommend the host consider both sides to organize a successful event.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing international sports events, and the economic benefit is regarded as one of t...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
... to sponsor a spectacular international events,the government may have to allocate an ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...onsor a spectacular international events,the government may have to allocate an enor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cilities and accommodation for athletes, which might be a great financial burden ...
^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eveloping countries. After the SEA Games , for example, Vietnam had to compensate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6963190184 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28556804855 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604294478528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8456532218 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.75 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165357803934 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644521682533 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472464358567 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107848299848 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364335665573 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.