The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the facuties of a major university in 2012
The given chart compares the popularity of male and female members in different departments of a university in 2012.
Overall, the number of male employed in engineering, science, business and law was higher than that of female, while there were more female staffs in education, arts and medicine. Additionally, engineering attracted the highest number of male, whereas the majority of females had an interest in education.
With regards of engineering, the discrepancy between the proportions of two genders was huge as the figure for male (above 80%) relatively four fold that of female (under 20%). Business, law and science also had the higher percentage of male academics, which were around 60%, while the figures for female were only roughly 40%.
The number of male in education was eclipsed by that of female, since eight out of ten academic staffs were female compared to a fifth members was male. A similar pattern could be seen in the figure for arts, while the ratio of female and male were almost 60% and more than 40% in turn. Interestingly, a relatively similar percentage of two gender staffs was employed in medicine, which stood at about 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... departments of a university in 2012. Overall, the number of male employed in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of a university in 2012. Overall, the number of male employed in engineeri...
^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
... staffs were female compared to a fifth members was male. A similar pattern could be se...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08808290155 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69898954269 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5495981117 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268513380014 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128245862744 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692103931865 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182161096679 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590170983869 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.