the graph shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000, 2004 and 2007
The bar graph illustrates the comparison of renewable energy in 4 certain countries during the period of the years 2000, 2004 and 2007.
Overall, Norway has the biggest total supply of renewable energy, followed by Iceland, while australia and germany have much less percentage and had not seen big varieties over the period. In general, both trajectories of rising and falling in the percentage were in Germany and Norway, Australia and Iceland, respectively.
With regards to Norway, after being flat in year 2000 and 2004 at about 61%, the delivery has risen significant to approximately 78%. Comparatively, Iceland has seen fluctuation during the period and then declined slightly to 54%, nearly the same percentage as in 2000, only higher at 3 per cent.
In contrast, Australia and Germany have not seen significant variations, as well as their total supply were lower at about 50%. While australian general procurement almost remained the same over the years, there was a steadily increase in German's energy supply, rising from 11 to 17%, approximately, by 6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, Australia and Iceland, respectively. With regards to Norway, after being flat...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as in 2000, only higher at 3 per cent. In contrast, Australia and Germany have ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 104, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...riations, as well as their total supply were lower at about 50%. While australian ge...
^^^^
Line 13, column 217, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ined the same over the years, there was a steadily increase in Germans energy supply, rising from 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, while, in contrast, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30813953488 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85914130835 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8785613933 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223566717159 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100883797462 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10572904885 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148896430006 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113058224198 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.