the graph shows the tourists came to Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003.
The line graph illustrates how many holiday-makers travelled to two countries; Malaysia and Dubai between 1995 and 2003.
It is clearly shown that both nations experienced a significant increase during the period shown. Additionally, visitors to Dubai witnessed a greater climb in number.
Looking at the graph in more detail, 100 thousand tourists came to the South-East Asian country, which was double that of Dubai. After a year, while there was a slight rise in the number of people paid a visit to Malaysia, the opposite was true for in Dubai. However, both of the two countries had a same pattern in the next two years, with a rise of almost 100 thousand backpackers. In 1999, the figure of tourists to Malaysia continued to climb to just over 250 thousand; in contrast, after a dramatic increase, Dubai received less visitors in the same year, just only 150 thousand.
The number in Dubai then bouncing and rocketing to nearly 350 thousand trippers, and it was also the statistic in Malaysia in 2001. Malaysia after reaching the peak in 2001, the holiday-makers gradually fall to just under 250 thousand in 2003. Regarding Dubai, the figure went down slightly before jumping to 400 thousand visitors at the end of surveyed period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun visitors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ter a dramatic increase, Dubai received less visitors in the same year, just only 15...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00480769231 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72469784846 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5317300509 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25403285518 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983108749537 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812055818743 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15586105325 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861538836974 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.