The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the information of the number of people who takes the metro from 6 am to 10 pm. It is obvious that the figure for the number of passengers is fluctuated over the period shown.
According to the graph, although there are only 100 people who take public transport in the morning at 6 o’clock, the amount of rail user rose dramatically to 400 in just 2 hours. Then fell back to around 180 by 10 o’clock. Before decreasing to 100 in afternoon, the figures of passenger steadily increased to 300 from 10 to 14 o’clock.
At the 17 o’clock the number of rail consumers rose to 200 then jumped up to roughly 380 at 18 o’clock. Before the amount of users slightly soar to 170 at 21 o’clock, significantly drop to just 120 people by the time of 19 and 20 o’clock. Then fell back to 140.
To conclude, there is a much rise and fall of the number of the rail users in London during a day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...ll back to 140. To conclude, there is a much rise and fall of the number of the rail...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49122807018 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95998876067 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9866921337 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810979601627 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421127781691 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418918891764 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698667125414 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051704533123 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.