The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the number of passengers in Underground Station in London over the distinct period of time on a regular basis.
Overall, while most people choose Underground Station in the rush hours and it witnesses a lowest number of passengers in the low hours.
A glance at the chart provided reveals that the initial number of commuters is 100 people at 6.00 am. It experiences an upward trend to its peak at 400 passengers at 8.00am and then plummeting to 190 people at 10am. There is a constant recovery to 300 commuters between 10 am to 14pm before plunging to its rock bottom at 100 people at 16pm.
A significantly increasing trend is observed since 16 pm onwards. It rockets to 390 passengers at 18pm before dropping to 125 people at 20pm. At the end of the surveyed period, the figure has a slight fluctuation and finishes at 150 goers at 22.00pm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...und Station in London over the distinct period of time on a regular basis. Overall, while mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...tion in the rush hours and it witnesses a lowest number of passengers in the low ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69480519481 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70928670334 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3794867665 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946965203411 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543138246902 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694548156154 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956050543353 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076723362001 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.