The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The graphs illustrate the proportion of people who owned computers of the population and by educational qualifications in 2002 and 2010. Units are measured in percent.
Overall, there was an upward trend in this period of time. However, the lowest values still belong to the no high school diploma group and the highest for the people who had postgraduate qualifications. The disparity is between two years inversely ratio to the levels of education.
There were about 58% of the population owned computers in 2002. In particular, people with no certificate only occupied about 15% in total. Whereas, postgraduate students inhabited three out of four in approximate.
The percentage in 2002 increased gradually in nine year until it peaked at slightly under 80% in 2010, which means it had increased approximately 20%. Although no high school diploma people were still at the bottom of a chart, the number had increased dramatically to just over 14%. At the same time, the postgraduate qualification group reached around 95% totality. The difference between two groups of people has decreased for approximately 20%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rall, there was an upward trend in this period of time. However, the lowest values still belon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...icate only occupied about 15% in total. Whereas, postgraduate students inhabited three ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, whereas, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33146067416 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05163761112 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8513342137 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0833333333 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189492175899 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693665230271 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873309688192 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125918386128 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619450723187 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.