The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001.
The pie charts provide information on the yearly expenditure of a UK university on a ten year interval between 1981 to 2001.
In general, as expected, the universities' money mostly goes to paying teachers' salary and they budget less in having an insurance during the 20 year period.
To start with, in 1981, it can be noted that this university spend the most on paying their employees' wages (40% goes to teachers and the 33% goes to other staff's). Also, they use their money on buying furniture and equipments (15%) and resources like books (10%) but pay less attention in acquiring insurance (2%). Meanwhile, in 1991, the univeristy paying the teachers' salary increased substantially to 55%, while paying other staff's wages considerably dropped to 23%. The school spending on resources and insurance rose to 12% and 3% respectively, whereas the money for refurbishment decreased to 7%.
In 2001, on the other hand, showed a different distribution of expenditure. The school still allocated most of their money to pay teachers' service but it fell to 45%. Also, paying other staff further went down to 3% and resources to 5%. At this time, the univeristy spent their money more in beautifying and developing their facility which is reflected on the chart as it climed up to 24%. In addition to that, getting school insurance rose slightly to 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...o 2001. In general, as expected, the universities money mostly goes to paying teachers sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts 15% and resources like books 10% but pay less attention in acquiring insuranc...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ile, in 1991, the univeristy paying the teachers salary increased substantially to 55%, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, in general, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96017699115 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78511266082 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2625868715 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109693713074 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045359031364 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061416453918 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809035108886 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058448408984 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.