The charts below show the percentage of men and women in diffirent weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.
The line graphs illustrate the number of men and women in various weight category, such as helathy weight, overweight, obese and dangerously obese, during the 9 year period from 1993 to 2002.
According to the chart, a little less than half of the male population is healthy. This figure dropped in 1998 to 40 percent and went down slightly to about 38 percent in year 2002. Another point to consider is the number of men that are overweight, the trend started at roughly 42% in year 1993 and then continued to increase steadily to 47% making most of the men overweight in year 2002. The number of obese also has the same movement where in it rose steadily from 10% in 1993 to 15% in 2002.
In comparison with male, the trend for womens' weight group mirrors the same. To be specific, those females who are having healthy weight decreased as well, from 42% in 1993 to 38% in 2002. The overweights and obeses' figure climbed up as well. The former from abour 56% in 1993 to approximately 58% in 2002 and the latter from roughly 11% to 28% in 2002. The data also showed that the number of dangerously obese for both male and female remains steady at 2% over the period given.
Overall, as reflected on the information provided, male and females' trend showed that while there is an increase in number of overweight and obese, the number of those that are healthy in terms of weight is declining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... from 10% in 1993 to 15% in 2002. In comparison with male, the trend for womens weight ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...latter from roughly 11% to 28% in 2002. The data also showed that the number of dan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57768924303 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38732200598 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8235797586 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.454545455 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234294016348 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890722130337 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575942439562 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148861791424 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548385374844 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.