The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates changes in number of local and overseas students in ten years period who secured admission in Australian universities. Overall, large number of local students got themselves admitted into institutions compared to overseas students.
To commence, total 4 lakh native students secured admission in 2001 and within 2 years the number surged by 1 lakh approximately. But, the admission rate in a year slowed down and the universities recorded a rise of 1 lakh students over the period of next 4 years which was comparatively slow than previous duration which recorded a lakh's rise. The number of local students reached its peak in 2007 and the line flattened in the next 3 years with numbers being constant. The number of commencing local students peaked in 2002 to more than 2 lakhs but gradually felt below 2 lakh in 2003. After certain fluctuation 3 years the numbers again rose above 2 lakh
On the other hand, the sum of overseas students increased considerably until the end of period without any downfall. The figures rose to more than 80000 from 20000 over the ten years period. Similarly, the universities recorded a steady rise in numbers of commencing foreign students until the end of period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... local students reached its peak in 2007 and the line flattened in the next 3 yea...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lakh' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lakhs'.
Suggestion: lakhs
...than 2 lakhs but gradually felt below 2 lakh in 2003. After certain fluctuation 3 ye...
^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut gradually felt below 2 lakh in 2003. After certain fluctuation 3 years the numbers...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lakh' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lakhs'.
Suggestion: lakhs
... 3 years the numbers again rose above 2 lakh On the other hand, the sum of overse...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02450980392 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81536042546 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9400785746 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.888888889 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251370476288 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12702380444 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548305051396 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198648403888 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423760039181 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.