The graphs below show the expenditure on health and education, UAE as percentage of GDP and infant mortality and life expectancy.
The bar chart illustrates the information about how much amount of GDP was spent on health and education, while line graph depicts the infant mortality and life expectancy in UAE from 1970 to 1992.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of expenditure went on education was significantly high all over the period. Also, life expectancy followed up ward trend ,however, infant mortality followed opposite trend.
To begin with,around 8% of GDP amount was spent on health in 1985, but equievalent figure was 10% on education. The percentage of GDP expanded on health was approximately 6.5% 1990, which followed a sharp increase to 10% over the period of three years. Interestingly, the expenditure on education remained unchanged to 14% between 1990 and 1993.
Furthermore, as per 1000 birth the number of infant mortality rate was 70 in 1970, but life expectancy of people was accounted to 60 years at the same period of time.There was a sharp decrease in the number of infant mortality rate to 20(1000 birth) in 1992.surprisingly, life expectancy of people increased to 70 years in 1992.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., life expectancy followed up ward trend ,however, infant mortality followed oppos...
^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , around
...owed opposite trend. To begin with,around 8% of GDP amount was spent on health in...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e was accounted to 60 years at the same period of time.There was a sharp decrease in the numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... to 60 years at the same period of time.There was a sharp decrease in the number of i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04940795711 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.510236322 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286111765136 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127385846571 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715684534025 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178968635794 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683343311596 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.