The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transport and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transport and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010.

The line chart gives information about the comparison of the number of public transport and private cars used in five cities in Australia over a period of ten years.

Overall, it can be seen clearly from the chart that the highest percentage of using public transport and private cars belonged to people living in Sydney, as compared to that of Aidelaide was the lowest. The proportion of people using private cars followed an upward trend during the given period of time.

First of all, the percentage of public transport used in Sydney was 20% in 2000 and there was a significant increase of 25% in 2010, as against that of Melbourne was lower, with about 19% in 2000 and rising slightly to 20% in 2010. Other three cities inluding Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide remained stable from 2000 to 2010, with 14%, 12% and 10% respectively.

On the other hand, the proportion of Sydney people who using private cars still took the first position in the list, with nearly 75% in 2000 and then increasing considerably to 90% in 2010. By contrast, that of Adelaide citizen was the lowest, with 60% in 2000 and then rising dramatically by 10% from 60% to 70%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (10 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...llowed an upward trend during the given period of time. First of all, the percentage of pub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, then, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74257425743 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4660422892 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509900990099 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1481735125 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361987939928 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166395278349 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714093106487 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222476808639 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457706816975 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.