The table showing percentages of water use for domestic, industrial and agriculture sectors in 6 countries in 2003.
The table gives information about the comparison of the amount of water using for three different sectors in six countries in 2003.
Overall, it can be seen clearly from the table that for domestic sector, the percentage of water using in Australia was the highest one among these countries, as against that of water used in industry was the least. For industrial sector, the first position belonged to the amount of water used in Canada, as compared to that of water used in agriculture was in China.
First of all, Australian people used maximum water for domestic sector, with 65%, while that for industry was only 2% and 33% for agriculture. In comparison, the proportion of water using in China take the first position in agriculture and the final position in industrial sector, with 87% and only 2% respectively. Canadian people consumed maximum water for industry, with 81%, 11% for domestic and 8% for agriculture sector.
On the other hand, the UK and Turkey people shared the same percentage of 73% for industrial and agricultural sectors respectively, as compared to there was the same proportion in water using in Russia, with 19% and 62% for industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ililmaidatuz | 70 | view |
- The table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agriculture sectors in 6 countries in 2003 76
- The tables below give the information a the temperatures and hours of daylight in two cities during the same weekend in May 2007 67
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption around the world and also the profit distribution Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- The tables below give the information a the temperatures and hours of daylight in two cities during the same weekend in May 2007 67
- The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transport and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72460444611 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.493545109 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.566218654359 0.215688989381 263% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.308504244793 0.103423049105 298% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052995372992 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365669801609 0.15604864568 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617536871643 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.