The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate post-school qualifications of Canadians aged from 25 to 35 and from 45 to 55 years old.
Overall, the proportion of young Canadians holding a degree is double that of the older group. Moreover, the majority of people in both groups study social science and arts for post-school qualifications.
The field of social science and arts attracts the highest number of students in both age groups, constituting 20%. The proportion of Canadians aged between 25 and 35 majoring in administration and education exceeds that of the 45-55 group by a slight gap. A similar pattern can also be seen in the data of the education field for two groups.
Only 9% of Canadian adults aged 25-35 study engineering, which is 10% less than that of the older people. The opposite pattern is evident in the distribution of Canadian postgraduates specializing in science, mathematics, and computer science. Moreover, nursing students aged between 45 and 55 nearly doubled that of the younger group.However, the statistics for MBA programs in the two age groups contrast significantly with those for nursing.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'majoring' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'majors'.
Suggestion: majors
...ion of Canadians aged between 25 and 35 majoring in administration and education exceeds...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...early doubled that of the younger group.However, the statistics for MBA programs in the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11648345669 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.298759675 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263218467897 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109896088698 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883888648594 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175688520247 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626179965924 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'majoring' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'majors'.
Suggestion: majors
...ion of Canadians aged between 25 and 35 majoring in administration and education exceeds...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...early doubled that of the younger group.However, the statistics for MBA programs in the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11648345669 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.298759675 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263218467897 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109896088698 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883888648594 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175688520247 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626179965924 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.