The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.
At fleeting glance the pie charts depict the information regarding the post-school qualifications which is held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. The data is calibrated in percentile.
Overall, the most striking feature apparent from this presention is that maximum 357500 Australians hold a degree between the age of 25 to 34. However, the uncausal feature that cannot be ignored that minimum 104800 Auatralians hold a degree between the age of 55 to 69.
Highlighting the presentation it is clear that, the maximun qualification was witnessed in social sciences, arts between the age of 25 to 34 with 19.48% while followed by administration with 19.08% and carried by science, maths, computers with 18.19%. However, the minimum degree was seen by law and other field was 5.55% and 2.24% respectively. Whilst, least qualification in architeture and veterinary agriculture was 1.85% and 2.1% accordingly. Degree in education field was 14.76% and 9.36% in engineering and 7.4% in medicine.
Moving further, pie chart the age between 55 and 69. The highest qualification in social sciences, arts was 20.42% and least qualification was in other field with 2.48%. Gain a degree in administration field by australians was 14.98% and education was 13.17%. While science, maths, computers was 10.11%. The popularity in engineering and medicine field was 19.27% and 13.11% accordingly. The degree hold by veterinary, agriculture was 2.0% and by law was 3.34% and architecture was 2.92%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...was 5.55% and 2.24% respectively. Whilst, least qualification in architeture and veteri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2875 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15136379207 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.331127718 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6428571429 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233051712891 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891402139405 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125560624154 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202095582624 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149336127856 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.