The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the changes in household spending in the UK between 1971 and 2001. It is clear that the cost of petrol made up the largest proportion of the household spending in 1971 while expenditure on cars was the greatest share of the household spending in 2001.
British spent more than one-third of their money on petrol and almost a third to purchase furniture followed by money spent in restaurants, which was precisely a quarter. The least proportion of expenditure was for computers, which accounted for 7% of total expenses by Brits in 1971.
After 30 years, British citizens spent significantly less portion to buy petrol, furniture and restaurant meals - 8%, 8%, 14% respectively. In comparison to 1971, they spent nearly double on computers. The largest proportion of household spending was made on owing cars with more than 40% total expenses. The proportion of expenditure on food was 14%. Finally, for books, it was considerably small, only one percent of total costs in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | an-an | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Sahil01 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | yahya976 | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | Thien Trang | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 73
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001. 56
- Nowadays more and more people are spending less time at home. Why do you think it happens? What effects does it have on individuals? 56
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 78
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0843373494 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84846214626 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8915611001 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171289723228 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874632503721 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129874155594 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136710522414 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132000116663 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.