The two table charts describe the sales of coffee and bananas which had factory tablet test to them and had sold in different European countries between 1999 to 2004
Oral it is interesting to note that the UK was the largest Market for fairtrad labelled coffee wild the Switzerland citizens more preferred to sale of Bananas.
Looking at the first graphene 1999 the highest sales cup coffee would be observed in Switzerland and 1.8 followed by UK. After that the least sales of copy was shot by Sweden and Belgium people with in one and 0.8 million of euroes. UK was the highest market for fairtrade labelled coffee in 2004 it accounts of at 20 millions of euros and in Sweden and Denmark people was the least interested sales of coffee it at 1 and 2 million of Heroes.
Moving Sardar it is Apparent from record chart that Switzerland was the largest Market of Bananas in fourth year after that second place taken by UK after 5 years in Sweden and Belgium was increased the sales of Bananas but Denmark was the least sales of banana in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e UK was the largest Market for fairtrad labelled coffee wild the Switzerland ci...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est Market for fairtrad labelled coffee wild the Switzerland citizens more prefe...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the Switzerland citizens more preferred to sale of Bananas. Looking at the fi...
^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he highest market for fairtrade labelled coffee in 2004 it accounts of at 20 mill...
^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...elled coffee in 2004 it accounts of at 20 millions of euros and in Sweden and Denmark people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59574468085 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31416603084 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.5836432971 43.030603864 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.8 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25950304164 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14385443814 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868825908047 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169631025327 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057619071349 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.