incidence of diseases in Someland from 1960 to 1995
The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in someland from 1960 to 1995/
The graph gives information about the number of people who contracted X disease in someland over a period of 35 years from 1960 to 1995.
Overall, it is clear that X disease had been raging for first half of the given period, with the number of infected people, who suffered from the disease, rising dramatically and reaching a peak of 500 cases in the mid seventies. X prevalence remained the same level, before dropping to zero in 1990.
At the beginning of the period, only a hundred people got X disease and this figure remained relatively constant for 5 years. Then, someland experienced an explosive increase in X prevalence, with figure peaking of 500 cases in 1970. There had been no change with regard to X disease for next 5 years.
For a decade, fortunate event occurred in someland and a significant decrease was done in the number of infected people, with figure dropping to zero by 1990. At this time until the end, X disease disappeared in this area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in someland from 1960 to 1995/ The graph gives information about the nu...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iod of 35 years from 1960 to 1995. Overall, it is clear that X disease had ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tically and reaching a peak of 500 cases in the mid seventies. X prevalence remai...
^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., before dropping to zero in 1990. At the beginning of the period, only a h...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard to X disease for next 5 years. For a decade, fortunate event occurred i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86559139785 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59274158709 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.218377432 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299435075384 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110655917989 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145661334564 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228790210915 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181308380229 0.0819641961636 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.