The presented table and circle charts compare the money in a regular family in terms of their earning and usage on groceries and clothing between 2010 and 2013 in a specific UK urban area.
Overall, although the fluctuations were observed, spending on food and clothes occupied approximately a half of total income in 2 conveyed years. In addition, the proportions fruits and vegetable accounting were high in both 2010 and 2013.
Turning into detail, in comparison to wages, which decreased considerably from 29000 in 2010 pounds to 25000 in 2013, the expense on nutrition and clothing mildly increased by 1000 pounds within 3 years. Particularly, it is evident that the percentage of other food and drinks kept unchanged, which occupied 18%. In contrast, that of fruits and vegetable grew dramatically to 35% in 2013.
Regarding to other categories, the oscillations of remaining sectors did not exceed 10%. Specifically, clothes and meat and fish not only had the similar percentage in 2010, which occupied more than 20% of the spending, but also shared the exactly same downward trend, in which the ratios of two sections dropped moderately by 10%. Meanwhile, the figure for dairy products accounted for 15%, before rising slightly to 20% in 2013.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19117647059 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81273040408 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.355573081 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157262751217 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573527360531 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394040838288 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951343095683 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331171895102 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.