The presented table indicates how the income and expenditure for cuisine and costumes of a middle-class household in a certain UK urban areas changed, while the pie chart compares five items in terms of the percentages they occupied in the entire spending. Both data refers to 2010 and 2013.
Overall, opposite trends were witnessed in the modifications of the family’s salary and expense. In addition, Meat and Fish was the sector which changed the most considerably during the period.
Turning into detail, between 2010 and 2013, the income decreased significantly from £29000 to £25000. By contrast, starting £14000, Food and Clothes cost gained slightly to £15000 over the same period.
Regarding to the pie chart, in 2010, in comparison to Dairy products, which accounted for 15% of total expenditure, the figure for food and vegetable was faintly higher, with 20%. At the end of the period, while the former grew gradually to 20%, the latter expanded remarkably to exactly 35%, occupying the biggest proportion among five counterparts. On the other hand, starting at 22% and 25%, respectively, Clothes as well as Meat and Fish shared the same diminishing level of 10% in 2013. Meanwhile, other food and drinks was the only item the number for which remained unchanged during the stage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch remained unchanged during the stage.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20379146919 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74941977335 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635071090047 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7966261991 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128113467539 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498487600351 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036750188436 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755840381537 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392192016831 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.