The table demonstrates total family income and expenditure on clothes and food per household in a UK city between 2010 and 2013. The pie charts illustrate how spending on food and clothes was broken down into 5 categories.
It is clear that, total income per household fell significantly, while the amount of money spent on food and clothes witnessed a slight rise. The proportion spending on fruits and vegetables increased sharply by 2013.
According to the table, we can see that the total income went up from 29,000$ in 2010 to 25,000$ in 2013. However, there was a minimal growth of 1,000$ to 15,000$ in spending on food and clothes during the period.
Looking more closely at the two pie charts, just one fifth spending on fruits and vegetables in 2010, it rose considerably by 15% in 2013, which accounted for the highest proportion among five categories. Similarly, the figure for daily products increased by 5% to 20% by 2013.
The most striking feature of the charts is that the percentage of expenditure on other food and drinks was unchanged at 18%. In contrast, spending on meat and fish and clothes dropped nearly half from more and less a quarter to just 15% and 12% respectively in 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...e that the total income went up from 29,000$ in 2010 to 25,000$ in 2013. However, th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...come went up from 29,000$ in 2010 to 25,000$ in 2013. However, there was a minimal g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...owever, there was a minimal growth of 1,000$ to 15,000$ in spending on food and clot...
^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...re was a minimal growth of 1,000$ to 15,000$ in spending on food and clothes during ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81730769231 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66829954938 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6878726557 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30586467694 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120068578181 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914344813558 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170468768749 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932125102921 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.