International migration in UK
The chart below illustrates the proportion of exodus and transmigtaion among inhabitants of UK from 1999 to 2008.
In general, trends shows an upward trend with some fluctuation in some periods which are followed by increasement in consequence. Actually, the level of immigration outweighs other figures. Moreover, the level net migration is twice less in comparison with emigration and during all period it fluctuated widely.
Moving to a more detailed information, from the beginning of 1999 till 2000 immigration and emigration numbers experienced a steady rise, but then while level of immigration flatten out for a year at the approximately 500,000, 2000 saw a gradual decrease in emigration rate at about 10,000. At that time there was a marked decline in net migration, which was followed by reaching a peak at nearly 250,000.
Afterwards, during a year from the middle of 2002 to 2003 number of both exodus trends reaches a plateau. However, after that level off , immigration hits the highest point at 600,000 with some gentle fluctuations. In contrast, only in 2008 there were a sudden surge up to under 450,000, which is considered to be the peak of emigration. Subsequently, as net migration depends on these two figures, it abruptly rocketed in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... inhabitants of UK from 1999 to 2008. In general, trends shows an upward trend...
^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Moreover, the level net migration is twice less in comparison with emigration...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a plateau. However, after that level off , immigration hits the highest point at 6...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1756097561 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04494330094 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639024390244 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1322629871 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0628084492859 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284999574487 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436952360173 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459258219565 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333875003379 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.