the line chart compares how much time it would take for 3 companies to manufacture a car from 2000 to 2012.
The graph illustrates how many days spent to build a car by three different manufacturers between 2000 and 2012.
It is clear that while the manufacturing cycle of a car from Honda and Toyota experienced the stability, that of Ford witnessed a dramatic increase during the period shown. Additionally, Toyota was by far the fastest company to make a complete car.
In 2000, Honda took nearly 33 days to manufacture an automobile, followed by about 28 days in Ford company. In comparison, Toyota spent least time producing a car, for approximately 18 days. Then both figures from Honda and Toyota slightly rose to about 35 days and just over 20 days respectively when there was a sudden drop in Ford company until reaching its lowest point, at about 11 days in 2004.
Honda spent more days to produce a car in the following years and stabilized at about 35 days in 2012. At the same period, there was a marginal fall in the figure of Toyota in 2008 and remained unchanged after that, at about 28 days. By contrast, Ford spent the exact 40 days on building a car in 2012, which was the highest number on the survey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
... in Ford company. In comparison, Toyota spent least time producing a car, for approximately...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64824120603 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64341669568 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5051437063 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176181146465 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088949620035 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558968099465 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131736183672 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516359685004 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.