The line chart shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the variations of total Earth population between 1400 and 2000, whereas the pie charts demonstrate the changes in overall population size according to the particular regions in 1900 and 100 years down the line.
Looking from the overall perspective, there was a quite moderate rise in the total population size since 1400 and during tree following hundred years by approximately 300 million people. But what follows is rater different: from 1600 to 1800 the size variations are apparent, as the number was fluctuating between 0,7 to 1,2 billion people. It accounts for equally one billion by the end of 1700s. Throughout the remaining period of time the world population increased sharply firstly by almost 1 billion and ended up on the amount of 6 billion people in 2000.
Turning to population distribution by region, the Asian population accounts for the largest share following by Europeans on the second place over a span of 100 years. Nevertheless, in 1900 Asians constituted 60% of the total amount of world population and the number decreased slightly down to 54$ by the end of 2000. Europe population mad up about a quarter in 1900 but also experienced a decline by 10% in the following hundred years.
Finally, Latin America and Africa seems to have similar patterns as their populations was almost tripled with the passage of the surveyed period: from 3% to 8% and from 4.5% to 13% respectively. Speaking about North Americans, their amount had no changes and balanced at the level of 5%, but there were some variations in the population of other countries, which had almost double increase in the number, totaling 6 % by the end of the 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... end of 1700s. Throughout the remaining period of time the world population increased sharply ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$54'.
Suggestion: $54
...d the number decreased slightly down to 54$ by the end of 2000. Europe population m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 283.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96819787986 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76713073372 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2338238341 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241307304821 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952608177574 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734840137944 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163916924619 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784641426507 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.