The graphs below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The six pie charts compare purposes of water usage in both North and South America, Europe, Africa and both Central and South East Asia.
Looking from the overall perspective, in 4 of 6 countries the majority of water resources are utilized in agricultural purposes (more that 70% of the total water supplies). In the remained two countries, North America and Europe, industrial use surpasses agricultural and domestic implementation, constituting to 48% and 53% respectively.
Water distribution in Asia shows us that the water resources for household use account for the equal shares in both regions, making up to 7%. Turning to the other countries, in Africa only 9% of waters are used domestically, whereas in South America its amount is totaling approximately to one fifth of the total water consumption.
As can be seen from the graph, North America and Europe have similar patterns with household water usage, accounting for 13% and 15% accordingly. Obviously, the remaining water resources in these continents are allocated with agricultural implementation: more than a third of all waters are directed to the farms and with other crop cultivation aims. Finally, the industrial water consumptions in Asian and African areas ranges from 5% to 12% and this ration is quite lower than that of Europe and North America. Interestingly, South East Asia uses more water for manufacturing than each of Africa, central Asia and South America.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, if, look, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26442307692 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08334291205 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0382835564 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.875 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154234237123 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720819764426 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404048915417 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995324669637 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361638894844 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.