The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 2000 to 2012
A glance at the graph provided reveals the amount of time need to assemble automobile by three different brands including Ford, Honda and Toyota during the period from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, there was a noticeable upward trend in the time used to produce a vehicle for Ford. Whereas, Toyota was the company need a least time to produce a car.
Decreasing from approximately 29 days in 2000,a Ford car's production time plunged to a low of just 11 days in 2004. In contrast, a Toyota car's production time peaked 21 days at the same time. Followed by a period of exponential growth, with the process of making a Ford car reaching a peak of 40 days in 2012.
Meanwhile, the remaining ones namely Honda and Toyota, took around 33 days, 17 days to manufacture a car in 2000, respectively. The following 4 years saw a gradually climb in these rate. After that, in 2012, time need to produce a Honda car, a Toyota car reached at 35 days, 18 days in that order.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ime used to produce a vehicle for Ford. Whereas, Toyota was the company need a least ti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...d. Whereas, Toyota was the company need a least time to produce a car. Decrea...
^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('climb') instead of another adjective.
...respectively. The following 4 years saw a gradually climb in these rate. After that, in 2012, tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55747126437 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58787302653 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3553390593 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240230262066 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105472911631 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455907240025 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149196220631 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00833044164481 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.