The line diagram outlines information about the number of clients of five correspondence administrations worldwide through the span of 10 years beginning from 1998
The line graph illustrates data about the number of users of five communication services worldwide over the course of 10 years starting from 1998
Looking at the graph, it can be seen that all services experienced some growth over the 10 years period, with cellular phone and Internet services rising the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication
In 1998, the amount of landline service user was the highest at about 15%, while the figures for cell phone and internet services were approximately 4% and 3%, respectively. Over the following four years, cell phone service strongly rose and equal to the increase of landline service at around 17%. In the same time, the remaining service recorded the development going to approximately 10%. Since 2002, the number of people using the cell phone flew up like a rocket and reached a peak of 65% population of the world. Meanwhile, the other two services increased and similar to around 20% of the number of people in the world in 2008
From 1998 to 2002, In two arrays of fixed broadband and mobile broadband was almost nobody to use. The figures for these two services slightly rose to rough 5% of the population by the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat all services experienced some growth over the 10 years period, with cellular ...
^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices rising the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83574879227 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57080189453 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.759050203 43.030603864 374% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.833333333 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147476424704 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596795952693 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565681848373 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126843121079 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121274381504 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.