The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that with broadcasters concentrating too much on coverage of urgent issues in society rather than on positive news will detrimental effects on citizens and the public as a whole. In my perspective, I think that this tendency brings both advantageous and disadvantageous impacts.
On the one hand, if new stories focusing on negative aspects in society appear with a greater frequency, it may be not a good thing for dwellers because that can have adverse influences on people's mental state. For example, information related to terrorism has become a common in the media that some inhabitants may hesitate to travel abroad in fear of suffering from a terrorist attack. Secondly, it can lead individuals to have a misunderstanding about aspects of society. Many tabloids usually exaggerate or make false reports creating sensational contents to attract readers' attention. For instance, spreading rumours about the COVID-19 epidemic on Facebook in VietNam, which has caused a part of the Vietnamese people to panic and doubt about the governments' prevention of the disease.
On the other hand, the focus on deleterious issues instead of positive development also has profitable. Firstly, reputation media can be seen as an effective way to spread with sources of reliable information to everyone everywhere even in remote areas. Secondly, it can help to raise awareness amongst citizens. The more negative stories appear in the media, the higher chance that dwellers will become aware of floating problems and take action towards a solution. For example, environmental pollution reports are one of the main matter and as a result, now humans gradually know that natural protection is vital.
In conclusion, with the reason aforementioned above, I think that broadcasters attempt to publish on adverse problems is beneficial although the harmful sides should also be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | pandaree.r | 67 | view |
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 84
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three di erent years who said they were interested in certain sports 95
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he public as a whole. In my perspective, I think that this tendency brings both a...
^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ese people to panic and doubt about the governments prevention of the disease. On the ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38720538721 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04913713095 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622895622896 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2475970909 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164153991424 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485094598041 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406190719756 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907730042129 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366150304311 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.