Line graph
This line graph outlines population growth patterns in China, India and the United States. All trends exhibit positive growth, albeit at different rates.
China’s population growth starts at just below 600 million in 1950. The following decade would see a swell to roughly 650 million people. After a slight lull in the early 1960s, Chinese population growth accelerates, and increases of almost 200 million people per decade are apparent. China hits a population of 800 million in 1970, one billion in 1980, 1.16 billion in 1990 and 1.25 billion in 2000. India’s growth is very similar. Starting with a population just shy of 400 million, India swells to 430 million in 1960 and then continues a very stable climb with slight acceleration over the following forty years. Its growth concludes at 1.1 billion in the year 2000. Although American population growth is much more modest, this
trend’s progression moves with greater predictability. The population of 160 million in 1950 expands in a gradual and unremarkable manner to 270 million by the year 2000. The upward trend seen in all three countries is expected to continue into the
foreseeable future.
- Line graph
- Nowadays many charities and organizations have to publicize their activities by giving a name to a particular day such as National Children s day for encouraging treatment of children National Non smoking Day for encouraging people to give up smoking Why 67
- Line graph 78
- In some countries children start school at the age of four and in the other countries at the age of seven Some people believe that early school start is affecting parent child relationship Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulation growth is much more modest, this trend’s progression moves with greater p...
^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries is expected to continue into the foreseeable future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67839864881 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624338624339 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6649589805 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0534792906799 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264998051388 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087889910663 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731703169362 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103478454574 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.