The line graph below gives information about number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The plotted line graph illustrates that data regarding the number of visitors to three museums (British Museums, Science Museums and Natural History Museum) of London from June to September 2013.
Overall, most of the tourists visited the British museum as compared to the other two museums and the figure also remained higher throughout the period.
In June 2013, 600 persons had been to the British museum in comparison with 550 and 400 people visited the Science Museum and Natural History museum respectively. However, the figures related to British museum had been increased and reached at the peak of 750 in July, while reverse had been observed in case of other two museums and the figure was almost 380 for both.
Moreover, the strength of visitors to the British museum significantly plummeted and accounted for 500 in August but stayed considerably larger in contrast to the figures related to the others. Furthermore, the number of visitors for all three museums dramatically rose in September where the highest 650 to British Museum and almost 450 to rest museum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15340909091 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56031957224 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.5162537191 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 151.166666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283887740916 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166607373837 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137300352375 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203485327914 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142987375202 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.