The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.

The line graph illustrates how many people visited different museums in London in the summer of the year 2013.

The British museum was definitely the most popular among the three, with an average of 600 visitors during the four-month period. It reached its peak in July with slightly less than 800 visitors.

The Science museum and the Natural History one had a similar trend. Only few more people chose to buy tickets for natural history exhibitions rather than scientific discoveries.
Less than 400 people visited these two museums during both July and August, while the number of visitors started to increase again in September.

In conclusion the attendance at the British museum increased dramatically in July and August, on the contrary the number of people visiting the Science and the Natural History museums peaked in June and September.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons rather than scientific discoveries. Less than 400 people visited these two m...
^^^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and August, while the number of visitors started to increase again in September. ...
^^
Line 8, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e Natural History museums peaked in June and September.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5225719098 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2029919494 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190472369537 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855173849642 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072088618113 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10996220702 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642341169718 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.