You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The line graph illustrates the amount of smoke and of sulphur dioxide which was present in the air in London between 1600 and 2000.

These two polluting gases had a similar trend over the years, even though the amount of sulphur dioxide was always higher than the smoke one.
The levels grew almost constantly with a relevant fluctuation from 1600 to 18500 when they reached their peak. In that year the micrograms of sulphur dioxide each cubic meter were nearly 1000. Probably the main reason were the emissions caused by the industrial revolution.
As for smoke its level was worrying at the beginning of the 20th century with slightly less than 500 micrograms per cubic metre.

Lucky both of the harmful gases faced an important decease in the last 50 years, obtaining the surprising result of having nearly zero emissions in the year 2000.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns caused by the industrial revolution. As for smoke its level was worrying at the...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30639208385 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659722222222 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2943709697 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927860448069 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417135255873 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387079466865 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517012395196 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040375201619 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.