The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph depicted the figure of multinational meetings in 3 following cities, namely A, B and C between 1965 and 2010.
Overall, while there was a fluctuation and as well as a downward trend in the number of conferences held in city A and B, city C keep its increasing pace over th 45-years period. As a consequence, city A surpassed the two other rivals, becoming the most popular destination for global conferences in 2010.
Turning into detail, the number of city A hit the bottom at 20 in 1975 after reaching its peak of 35 conferences at the start of the period. On the other hand, whereas city B suffer the same downward trend, the intensity was smaller, resulting in two times standing at the bottom of about 5 conference lower compared to ist peak of 30. Furthermore, during the same period,while the fluctuation occurred to both cities, not only the magnitude but also the frequency of that in city A was more higher compared to city B.
Regarding to the remaining city, the situation is opposite, with an overall steady upward trend over 4 and a half decades. Despite standing at the third ranking with 5 meetings in 1965, it skyrocketed to above 25, prior to reaching the top with six times higher to the beginning of the period. Although there was a slight decline in 2005, at the end of the period, city C was ranked first with 30 conferences, followed by city B and C, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
... 30. Furthermore, during the same period,while the fluctuation occurred to both cities...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...lso the frequency of that in city A was more higher compared to city B. Regarding to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty A was more higher compared to city B. Regarding to the remaining city, the sit...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...followed by city B and C, respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, regarding, so, third, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65079365079 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80922112978 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.935472279 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139500187439 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639141579727 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395534188222 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984346458397 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396455443679 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.