Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together.
Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Residents have sparked off a heated controversy over how students are arranged to training institutions. While many people believe that students should learn together regardless of their academic performance, I believe that classifying them in terms of their scholastic capability offers more advantages.
On the one hand, citizens recommend schools to accept learners with various competencies because of several reasons. To begin with, many countries are witnessed to take legal actions in hopes of establishing an egalitarian society, and education has been put an emphasis in their agenda. Therefore, separating students on the grounds of their academic abilities, which deprives average learners of chances to approach lectures delivered to the more competent, may violate the equality of opportunities and oppose such objective. In addition, it is predicted that approving students from all levels, schools are able to create a microcosm of actual life. As a result, this plays a pivotal role in educating students about the intrinsic difference between individuals, so that they can quickly integrate themselves into the society when entering their adult life.
On the other hand, I opine that streaming in schools based on academic comprehension is more advantageous. Regarding teachers, only by this policy is the transmission of knowledge facilitated. Indeed, when there is no significant distinction in learners’ capabilities, they will acquire knowledge at similar paces, so this is not urgent for instructors to tailor their teaching style such that it fits a minor population in classes. Last but not least, regarding students, the classification is also expected to exert positive impacts on their mental development. Specifically, if they find their classmates at the same level, a competitive spirit will be naturally formed; hence, not only does it eradicate complacent attitudes among high flyers, but it also prevent average students from viewing themselves as failures and rejuvenate their interests in studying.
Briefly, although the benefits of an institution with all types of student are discernible, it seems to me that they are overshadowed by those from a separation in terms of academic aptitude.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety when entering their adult life. On the other hand, I opine that streamin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 761, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevents'?
Suggestion: prevents
...ttitudes among high flyers, but it also prevent average students from viewing themselve...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...juvenate their interests in studying. Briefly, although the benefits of an in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62721893491 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1198978867 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1239974436 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.307692308 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226888910345 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730267074151 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568091500154 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139569966615 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638808832475 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.