Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports, but others think that people should have the freedom to do whatever sport activities they choose, Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Extreme sports have raised a question of whether they should be prohibited or not. While a number of people support banning such disciplines, it seems to me that entitling citizens to opt for their desired physical activities offers more advantages.
On the one hand, outlawing extreme sports is considered as a reasonable legal action thanks to positive impacts it exerts on the society. Indeed, there have been many cases in which participants in such sports became out of condition, since they inherently have a high probability of injuries. For example, researchers have shown that in comparison to casual disciplines like football or tennis, such dangerous ones as bungee jumping or kayaking observed a significantly higher rate of fatal accidents or life-threatening conditions. Therefore, as an organ responsible for public health, it is favorable for the authority to adopt policies prohibiting these sports, which may act as a deterrent for residents against putting their lives in jeopardy. By contrast, if the aforementioned regulations are neglected, that will be detrimental as severe injuries are more likely to happen, which leave individuals medically and financially exhausted.
On the other hand, I believe that extreme sports should not be restricted for several reasons. To begin with, taking up these disciplines, players have already taken sensible precautions like equipping themselves with essential sport gears. Hence, when people are fully aware of their safety, any prohibition on safety grounds may be less effective, or even redundant. In addition, there has been a consensus that the government should tighten its control over a certain activity only if its drive is against moral value. Thus, if the authority imposes an official ban on extreme sports, the purpose of which is just keeping fit, this can threaten and diminish public confidence on legislative branch because residents may deem it as a privacy infringement rather than a protection.
Briefly, I concur with the view that people should be free to participate in dangerous sports, provided that they abide by the safety rules.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...infringement rather than a protection. Briefly, I concur with the view that peo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42168674699 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98196422029 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632530120482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4708012137 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.461538462 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207909342533 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770382668678 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613104499101 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147822100714 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456445717863 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.