The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Austalian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph compares of the fast food consumption of teenager in Australia between 1975 and 2000.overall, it can be noticed that the consumption of fish and chips decreased over the period, whereas the amount of pizza and hamburger eaten increased.
It can be seen that hamburger rose gradually from around 10 time in 1975 to roughly 85 time a year by 1985. Output then leveled off at 100 time per year mark from 1995 to 2000. However, looking at the amount of fish and chips consumption, it shows that this Annual pattern is largely reversed: the most of fish and chips (exactly as 100 times) was eaten was in 1975, followed by a marked decline to nearly 80 times in 1985. The amount of fish and chips consuming then climbed progressively, rising to little more than 85 times by 1985 before dropping down to just below 40 in 2000.
In case of Pizza consumption, this appears to reflect the number of hamburger consumed by teenager, with an early low of about 10 times in 1975, raising consistently to approximately 82 times in 1995. The consumption then remained stable at roughly 82 time by 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 2000.overall, it can be noticed that the consumption of fish and chips decrea...
^^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be seen that hamburger rose gradually from around 10 time in 1975 to roughly 8...
^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fish') or simply say ''most fish''.
Suggestion: most of the fish; most fish
...Annual pattern is largely reversed: the most of fish and chips exactly as 100 times was eate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67179487179 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63839052009 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2914227796 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212621028574 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976697456966 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644675887231 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149116206571 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729615586901 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.