The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004.
The line graph illustrates the weekly intake of four different types of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb and fish, between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, chicken consumption steadily increased, while beef’s and lamb’s decreased. Great fluctuations were seen in the usage of beef and fish intake stayed relatively unchanged.
The demand of chicken consumption started the period with a little less than 150 grams per person per week and it continued to rise. Eventually, in 1989, it exceeded the consumption of beef, before reaching a peak of around 250 in 2004. Lamb consumption, at the start of the period, stood at a very similar value as chicken, but in contrast, it’s demand continued to fall, until it reached a low of about 50 in 2004.
Beef consumption was the highest, having a value of a little above 200grams per person per week, in the year 1979, and this dropped dramatically in the upcoming few years to around 160, before reaching a high of around 250 grams in 1984. It remained stable for a stretch of few years and subsequently fell to approximately 50 in 2004. however, the weekly consumption of fish remained at around 50 grams per person for the entire period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ently fell to approximately 50 in 2004. however, the weekly consumption of fish remaine...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78232691035 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9083687814 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133407062737 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619329170191 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590633743958 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967570647837 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704526321802 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.