The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares the areas of land for growing organic crops in two different countries from 1985 to 2010. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the land allocated to organic farming grew considerably in both countries.
In 1985, both countries, A and B, grew organic crops in 25 thousand hectares each. In the next five years, the land for organic farming increased slightly in both countries and reached 30 and 60 thousand hectares respectively. From 1990 to 1995, there was a sharp escalation and over 150,000 hectares was used in both countries for organic agriculture. After 1995, the figure for country A continued to grow and reached a peak of 280,000 hectares. The country B showed only a moderate increase in the land used for organic farming. After 2000, however, both countries showed a minimal decrease in organic farming. From 2005 to 2010, the decreasing trend continued in both countries, but the fall was more marked in country A and the arable land for organic crops fell to 150,000 hectares each in both countries.
Overall, the area for organic crops increased till 2000, but after that the popularity of organic farming decreased.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94029850746 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59161482751 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2175393621 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29367922302 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146937760642 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810102559751 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219005735349 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787154608994 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.