The given line graph provides the information about the frequencies by which tourists visited different Brighton’s attractions such as the Art Gallery, the Pavillon, Pier and the Festival over a period of 30 years, between 1980 to 2010.
At a first glance, the place that attracted the largest part of visitors was the Pavillon whereas the least visited one resulted to be Pier, even if it has experienced an increasing trend from 2000.
Overall, not a big discrepancy between Art Gallery’s and Festival’s figures could be noted, except for a steep fall recorded in the number of Art Gallery’s visitors since 2000.
As the data suggest, Pavillon experienced an increasing popularity between 1985 and 1995, year in which the biggest tourists’ affluence was reached at just slightly below 50%. Hence, the figure started to decrease reaching about the 30% in 2010. Though Art Gallery used to attract the largest proportion of tourists visiting England in 1985, its popularity has been overcome by all other attractions in 2010 accounting for less than 10 percent of visiting people. On the other hand, Pier showed an opposite trend respect to the Art Gallery, gaining success in the last 2 years of the overmentionated period of time.
Festival proved to be an appreciated attraction experiencing a constant trend during the considered period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 601, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the last 2 years of the overmentionated period of time. Festival proved to be an appreciate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, whereas, except for, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23394495413 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89100386979 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628440366972 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7800566028 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141032176157 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596439552197 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645615550226 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764376436032 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700594526694 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.