The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line chart demonstrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four different tourist traps in Brighton in the stage between 1980 and 2010. Overall, the percentage for tourist who visited pavilion and pier is rising over, while that figure for art gallery and festival witnessed decrease.
The percentage of tourists enjoyed pavilion and pier grew over time. To be more specific, the figure of visitors going to the pavilion significantly increased from 22% in 1980 to nearly half of total number of Brighton’s tourists in 1995, after which remarkably fell to 30% in 2010. The number of visitors that pavilion attracted in 1985 even surpass the figure for festival the previous dominant attraction at 28%. Similarly, the amount of tourist who went to pier underwent a slightly growth between 1980 and 1985 to 15% then gently decreased till reached the bottom which is 9% in 1990. And once again, the figure for pier continuously rose by the end of 1990.
In contrast, the figure for tourists visited art gallery and festival witnessed decrease tendency. The number of people went to art gallery used to drastically increase from 1980 to 1985 till reaching the peak which is 45% in 1985 and became the most common places for Brighton’s visitors. Afterwards, the number for art gallery did not stop declining until 2010 at the 8% which is the lowest rate among four categories. Although, experiencing the same trend with the figure for art gallery, the proportion of tourists visited festival was more likely to remain stable though years. This number was just slight decrease by 3% after 30 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...t of tourist who went to pier underwent a slightly growth between 1980 and 1985 to 15% then gentl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t slight decrease by 3% after 30 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0147601476 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66588758289 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509225092251 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9829902449 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130904646081 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578545757769 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496343978447 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11530459072 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593430376819 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.