The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
The table demonstrates the pattern of change over time of five most-eaten junk foods in Melbourne from 2005 to present and then anticipates the future change of these trends. Overall, the number of hamburgers has decreased slightly while all consumed quantities of four left-over have risen since 2005. According to the future prediction, all the number of fast food will continue to increase except from fried rice which is predicted to remain stable.
Between 2005 and present, it could be seen that the figure for fried chicken, fried rice and noodle have witnessed gentle raises by 2 units each kind of four fast food mentioned. In contrast, the number of hamburgers has slightly declined from 40 to 38 units. However, Hamburgers still holding the title of most consumed junk food in Melbourne, outpacing that of noodle by 30 units at the present.
In 2025, the quantity of eaten hamburgers is estimated to increase to 51 units and still be the most common food among Melbourne’s citizens. Similarly, the amount of fried chicken and noodle is forecasted to rise slightly in 2025. The number of salads is also expected to skyrocket from 15 to 41 units, which is nearly the amount of fried chicken. Different from all the above, the figure for fried rice is set to experience a period of stability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of noodle by 30 units at the present. In 2025, the quantity of eaten hamburger...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et to experience a period of stability.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, still, then, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94570135747 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66348694218 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547511312217 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9662321834 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165946581546 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655337759754 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516096914952 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119663748763 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235055867183 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.