The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate Of
England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and
reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given line graph illustrates the information about the population size, and also compares the birth and mortality rate of England and Wales for a period of 300 years starting 1700.
Overall, it is evident that the population size showed an upward trend, whereas death and birth rate showed a fluctuation trend. There was a little different in statistic of both rate during given time but trend was almost same.
The death and birth rate were at slight above 25 and 30 respectively by 1700. From 1700-1750, an increase was seen in both these, with birth rate rising from 30 to 40 births per 1000 people and the death rate inclined from around 27 to 37 per person. That rate remained stable for next 50 years, after which there was a sharp fall with both trend. After a flew fluctuation, the birth rate stop at around 34 birth and the death rate touched 20. In contras of down trend, population size rate showed increase for 50 years of starting. It remain same for coming 50 years. From 1800, there was drastic increment in population size and it stood at highest level which was 50.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...d increase for 50 years of starting. It remain same for coming 50 years. From 1800, th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or coming 50 years. From 1800, there was drastic increment in population size and...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t stood at highest level which was 50.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64948453608 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3028779584 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7017985224 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329716432213 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14207009771 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847506912273 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238264715976 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395629374217 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.