The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000.
The line graphs illustrate the amount of three different materials of forest industry produced over the course of 20 years, starting in 1980. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, it is clear that the production of paper and packaging accounted for the biggest change out of those categories. Sawn-wood and wood pulp experienced a downward trend throughout the given period, and sawn-wood recorded the most dramatic decrease in the two remaining types of materials.
In 1980, the manufacture of paper and packaging was around 230 million tonnes. The figures for sawn-wood and wood pulp were lower, at about 200 million tonnes and 160 million tonnes respectively. In 1990, the quantity of paper rose to nearly 250 million tonnes, while the numbers for both products of forest industry fell by 150 million tonnes in the same year.
By 2000, the production paper and packaging was the highest, its figure spiked by 100 million tonnes, compared to approximately 125 million tones sawn-wood and 152 million tonnes wood pulp in turn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...starting in 1980. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, it is clear that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the two remaining types of materials. In 1980, the manufacture of paper and pa...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...The figures for sawn-wood and wood pulp were lower, at about 200 million tonnes and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15976331361 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6203465742 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.999840561 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321706317106 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130610902788 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908458485131 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199611917952 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738501960492 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.